JOOLA Hyperion 3S 16 vs JOOLA Ben Johns Perseus Pro IV 16
Our call: JOOLA Ben Johns Perseus Pro IV 16 (DinkScore 93 vs 89) — but the per-spec wins below can flip it for your game.
JOOLA
Hyperion 3S 16
aggressive baseliners moving up
89DinkScore
Spin5/5
Power4/5
Control3/5
Forgiveness3/5
★ Our pick
JOOLA
Ben Johns Perseus Pro IV 16
advanced all-court power
93DinkScore
Spin5/5
Power4/5
Control4/5
Forgiveness3/5
| Spec | JOOLA Hyperion 3S 16 | JOOLA Ben Johns Perseus Pro IV 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Face | Raw carbon | Raw carbon |
| Core | Polymer honeycomb | Polymer honeycomb |
| Thickness | 16mm | 16mm |
| Shape | Elongated | Elongated |
| Weight | 8 oz | 8.1 oz |
| Swing weight ≈ | 116 | 118 |
| Price band | $180–$250 | $250+ |
| Arm-friendly | No | No |
The verdict
Buy the JOOLA Ben Johns Perseus Pro IV 16 if you want the better overall package — it leads the DinkScore 93 to 89 and is the stronger fit for advanced all-court power.
Buy the JOOLA Hyperion 3S 16 if its strengths match your game — it's built for aggressive baseliners moving up, and it sits in a different price band ($180–$250 vs $250+), which may settle the question by itself. Still torn? The Paddle Finder weighs the full database against your answers, not just these two.